| Related sites for http://www.gmoafrica.org |
| Respectful_Insolence The ramblings of a surgeon/scientist about medicine, quackery, science, pseudoscience, history, and pseudohistory (and anything else that interests him). | | Scientia_Natura__Evolution_And_Rationality Scientific and theological ramblings from an evolutionary perspective. | | The_Scientific_Activist Reporting from the crossroads of science and politics. | | _Drugs_and_DNA Blog on science taboos and the politics that shape science and health policy. | | Skeptic_Rant Random thoughts on matters political, religious, and scientific | | Skeptico Critical thinking for an irrational world. | | teKnOSo_-_Art,_Science,_Technology,_Culture A blog on interactivity, psychoanalysis, digital and mobile art and culture, gaming, and art-science-technology innovations. | | Unintelligent_Design A skeptical pediatrician's take on child health care, alternative medicine, pseudoscience, and sometimes religion. | | ZENSCI_-_Making_Sense_of_Science Science and society issues blog - particular focus on science and religion. | | American_Geophysical_Union AGU is an international scientific society of 35,000+ members. AGU homepage has many hyperlinks to earth, oceans, atmosphere, space, and planets. AGU homepage welcomes members of the public, includi | | Geo_Site Good starting point for all amateurs interested in Geology (professionals are also welcome). This geological site was the first in Sweden. | | GeoForum Internet-based, technical information system. All Internet-based information contained in Geoforum.com is free of charge | | Geology_com__--_Earth_Sciences_on_the_Web Links to popular topics in Geology and other earth sciences, plus earth sciences journals, and university departments. | | Geologyone_com Geoscience news; earth science internet links; directories of earth science software and clipart resources; listings for scientific instruments; dealers of minerals and gemstones. | | The_Germplasm_Resources_Information_Network Provides germplasm information and links about plants, animals, microbes and invertebrates within the National Genetic Resources Program (NGRP) of the USDA-ARS. | | Molecular_Cytogenetics_and_Genome_Evolution Study of the function of the cell nucleus, and the nature, evolution, expression, recombination and segregation of the DNA sequences within the nucleus at interphase. | | Stanford_Genomic_Resources Provides links to various systematic analysis projects, resources, laboratories, and departments at Stanford University. Includes databases, and genome centers and projects. | | Acta_Ichthyologica_et_Piscatoria AIeP (founded in 1970) is an international, English-language journal for ichthyology and fisheries. Available online in PDF format. | | Applied_Ocean_Research Encourages the submission of papers that advance the state of knowledge in a range of topics relevant to ocean engineering. Tables of contents and abstracts; full text by subscription. | | Archive_of_Fishery_and_Marine_Research International journal on marine research which was merged into the Journal of Applied Ichthyology in 2005. Details of last volume. | | Atmosphere-Ocean A medium for the publication of the results of original research, survey articles, notes, and comments on published papers in all fields of the atmospheric, oceanographic, and hydrological sciences. P | | Botanica_Marina Covers the entire field of marine botany including marine microbiology and marine mycology. Its purpose is to disseminate original knowledge, to provide synopses of global or interdisciplinary interes | | Bulletin_of_Marine_Science Publishes research dealing with the tropical and subtropical waters of the world's oceans and marine science. Published by the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami. | | Bulletin_of_the_Sea_Fisheries_Institute Includes articles by authors worldwide who are involved in marine biology, ichthyology, physical and biological oceanography, fish processing and technology, fishing techniques as well as topics conce | | Chinese_Journal_of_Oceanology_and_Limnology Provides comprehensive coverage of the latest developments in these areas in China and seeks to promote academic exchange between Chinese oceanologists and limnologists and their colleagues elsewhere. | | Coastal_Management_Journal Devoted to issues of governance and management of the coastal environment. Tables on contents; full text available to subscribers via Ingenta Select. | | Continental_Shelf_Research Concentrates on the results of original research in physical oceanography, chemistry, ecology, and sedimentology together with contributions on more applied aspects of continental shelf research. | | Deep_Diving_in_Submarine_Canyons Personal narrative of Delta submersible diving in Southern California's submarine canyons. [PDF] | | Deep_Sea_Research_Part_I Takes an interdisciplinary approach to oceanography. Publishes the results of original scientific research, the solution of instrumental problems, and new laboratory methods in the marine sciences. Ta | | Deep_Sea_Research_Part_II__Topical_Studies_in_Oceanography Publishes topical issues from international and interdisciplinary projects in oceanography and also collections of papers presented at conferences. Tables of contents and abstracts; full text availabl | | Dynamics_of_Atmospheres_and_Oceans Publishes research articles on the fluid dynamics of atmospheres and oceans and their interactions, on related basic dynamical processes, and on climatic and biogeochemical problems in which the fluid | | Estuarine,_Coastal_and_Shelf_Science An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. Tables of conte | | Fisheries_Oceanography Sponsored by the Japanese Society for Fisheries Oceanography, this international journal is designed to present a forum for the exchange of information amongst fisheries sceientists worldwide. Publish | | Geo-Marine_Letters An international journal for the publication of short, original studies and reviews dealing with all marine geological aspects. Online and print versions. | | Glaucus Journal of the British Marine Life Study Society. Contents list and sample articles. | | International_Ocean_Systems European-based magazine which is distributed worldwide. It covers the field of ocean data gathering, underwater surveying, and instrumentation. Profile, current issue. | | Journal_of_Geophysical_Research_-_Oceans An interdisciplinary journal containing original contributions on the physics and chemistry of the Earth, its environment, and the solar system. Publication of the American Geophysical Union (AGU). | | Journal_of_Marine_Research Publishes articles, either theoretical or descriptive, dealing with interdisciplinary oceanographic research. The journal is published six times a year. Tables of contents and abstracts; full text by | | Journal_of_Physical_Oceanography Published monthly by the American Meteorological Society, it covers research related to the physics of the ocean and to processes operating at its boundaries. | | Journal_of_Plankton_Research Publishes papers dealing with both zoo and phytoplankton, in marine, freshwater and brackish environments. Published by Oxford University Press. |
|
GMO AFRICA @import url( http://www.gmoafrica.org/wp-content/themes/greenway-lcr/style.css ); A.iconsphere { background: url(http://www.sphere.com/images/sphereicon.gif) top left no-repeat; padding-left: 20px; padding-bottom: 10px; font-size: 10px; white-space: nowrap;}GMO AFRICAHomeAboutBlog ArchiveBiotech NewsGuest BlogsBiofuels Advertisements View video conversations with farmers and experts worldwide Advertise with UsRecent Entries Indian researcher makes a case for biotechnology Link of ethanol use to high food prices questioned EU challenges France on GM Maize Italy’s health minister favors GM crops South Africa approves biotech sorghum Maize yields in Europe declining? African scientist honored for her work in agriculture GM ‘vital’ to meeting the world’s food needs Professor seeks drought-tolerant potato Bt maize pollen poses no risk to green lacewings Biotechology Blogroll A Hunger KidA New Kind of ScienceAdam Smith Institute BlogAdventure in Ethics and ScienceAfrican AgricultureAgricultural Development PerspectiveAgricultural LawAgriculture InformationAgriculture ResourcesAgWiredArizona BiotechBay BlogBio On the RoadBiomedical Engineering BlogBionuclear BunnyBiosingularityBiotech BlogBiotech Bloggers Google GroupBiotech Brasil (English)Biotech Brasil (Portuguese)Biotech Knowledge CenterBiotechnology ClubBiotechnology HubBiotechnology WireBlog World HungerBLOGbiotechBlogging the Biotechnology RevolutionBlogSciBusinessEthics.caCoffee and Sci(ence)DNA for DinnerEpigenetic NewsEthanol BusinessEye on DNAEye on ScienceFBAE Biotech BlogFood SafetyFree Association Nature Genetics BlogGeneSequence BlogGenetic MaizeGenetic ModificationGenetically Modified Food WikipediaGenetics & HealthGenome Technology OnlineGM Science ReviewGMO Africa MySpaceGMO CompassGMO Food For Thought BlogGMO PunditGMO-Why is it Evil?GMObelusGMObelusGMOIrelandIn Search of EnlightenmentJackie DanickiMatt MullenMeetScienceMiketionaryMy Biotech LifeOneWorld WeblogsPatent BaristasPlant Biotech BlogScience & PoliticsScience BaseScience BaseScience BlogScience BlogsScienceRollSkepticoTerry Etherton Blog on BiotechnologyTerry Etherton’s Blog on BiotechnologyThe Center for “B-Science” Peer ReviewThe GrapevineThe Human ImprintThe Skeptics SocietyTomorrow’s TableUC Biotech Blog and news on the benefits of genetically modified food in Africa.Indian researcher makes a case for biotechnologyPublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
The journal Nature has published an article about how developing countries can make the best from biotech. Indira Nath, the article’s author, argues biotechnology can revolutionize food production and healthcare in developing countries only if these countries bolstered their scientific capacity. Nath regrets intellectual property rights coupled with inhibit scientists from developing countries from accessing critical technologies. Further, the ongoing opposition to genetically modified foods in both developed and developing countries continues to stymie food production in the former countries. To address this situation, Nath calls on governments in developing countries to intensify efforts in training researchers. They should also provide them with necessary technologies to do their work. Nath joins a long list of scientists from developing countries calling on their governments to be more proactive promoting science and technology for sustainable development. Dr. Calestous Juma, a Kenyan scientist currently teaching at Harvard, has been another vocal supporter of biotechnology. Writing in Japan Times in July this year, Dr. Juma called on G-8 countries to encourage biotech cooperation in Africa. He cautioned that over-emphasis on biosafety was hindering many African countries from adopting biotechnology. Nath and Dr. Juma make very strong cases for biotechnology. They are worth listening to.
Sphere: Related Content November 15th, 2008. Comment now » EU challenges France on GM MaizePublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
The European Union (EU) is again challenging France’s decision to ban a genetically modified (GM) maize developed by the U.S.-based biotech giant Monsanto. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is angry that France has refused to allow the cultivation of MON 810, the only GM crop being grown in the European Union.“No specific scientific evidence, in terms of risk to human and animal health and the environment, was provided that would justify the invocation of a safeguard clause,” EFSA said in an opinion article on its web site. These are weighty words, coming especially from such a nonpartisan organization as EFSA. They’re words directed not only at France but other European countries weighing on the issue of genetically modified crops. The issue of the safety of GM foods has been discussed since the introduction of the first genetically modified crop in 1996. Reputable organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. National Academies of Science have issued numerous reports on the safety of GM foods. In June 2005, for instance, WHO released a report entitled Modern Food Biotechnology, Human Health and Development, which reaffirmed the safety of GM foods. The U.S. National Academies of Science, itself, has on numerous occasions cautioned against condemning GM crops on the basis of non-scientific evidence. France and other countries opposed to crop genetic engineering will do their citizens proud if they allow science to guide every decision of GM crops. Blanket condemnation of GM crops doesn’t serve the interests of farmers. It only denies them an opportunity to boost food production.
Sphere: Related ContentNovember 3rd, 2008. Comment now » Italy’s health minister favors GM cropsPublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
Italy’s health minister Maurizio Sacconi would like her country to lift the ban on genetically modified crops (GM) in his country. Sacconi told an international food forum recently that Italy needed to apply the European principle of co-existence of different production technologies. The principle lays out clear guidelines on how organic and GM crops should be grown together. Sacconi’s stand on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is, to say the least, a courageous one. Anti-GMOs sentiments run high in Europe and for a person of Sacconi’s caliber to state her pro-GMOs position publicly is not a mean thing. Secondly, Sacconi’s position on GM crops is an informed one. It’s not from every Tom, Dick and Harry. Remember Sacconi is in charge of the ministry of health in Silvio Berlusconi’s government. He must be privy to the latest data on the safety of genetically modified foods. It’s not surprising that in making a case for GMOs, he mentioned that “… all scientific research should be rigorously tested.” The European Union (EU), despite its opposition to GM crops, ought to be listening to the likes of Sacconi. Sacconi is one of voices of reason and common sense in Europe on the issue of genetically modified foods.
Sphere: Related ContentOctober 23rd, 2008. Comment now » South Africa approves biotech sorghumPublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
South Africa has made another step forward in the field of crop biotechnology. After a rancorous debate over whether genetically engineered sorghum should be grown in greenhouses, the South African government has given its nod to the project.The decision was a huge blow to anti-GMOs activists in South Africa, led by the South African GMO Executive Council, which had waged a relentless campaign against the new sorghum variety.Called “Super Sorghum”, it’s nutritionally enhanced with more amino acids. The Council for Scientific Industrial Research (CSIR), which had been spearheading the approval, lauded the government’s decision saying it was testimony South Africa had robust biosafety laws.“We respect the fact that decision-makers have an obligation towards safety and that rigorous investigations are part of the process. Work on the project will now continue in our level 3 biosafety greenhouse,” said CSIR Biosciences Executive Director, Dr Gatsha Mazithulela, soon after the government announced the approval decision.The “Super Sorghum” has received worldwide support, including from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has already committed about $17 million to the project. The project is being spearheaded by Florence Wambugu, a renowned Kenyan agricultural biotechnologist, who also heads the Africa Harvest Biotech International Foundation (AHBIF).
Sphere: Related ContentOctober 12th, 2008. Comment now » Maize yields in Europe declining?Published by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
I speak and comprehend a little French. There’s this video that features Klaus Ammann saying corn yields in Europe have gone down. David Tribe of GMO Pundit has picked up the issue on his blog.Let me mention something small about David. He is a characteristically mercurial scientist. I must admit I’ve not come across a scientist as interested in science communication as David.On this blog, I’ve repeatedly called on scientists not to allow rookies to distort their work. David seems to have heeded my call. He writes prolifically about agricultural biotechnology. He doesn’t fear to be branded “a shill of this and that multinational biotechnology corporations.” These are some of intimidatory accusations anti-technology activists use to try to silence folks like David.In 2006 I urged scientists to come out and defend the science behind crop genetic engineering. Then, I noted that the voices of few scientists who were willing to stand up to opponents of crop genetic engineering were being drowned by these self-styled activists, who’ve very scant knowledge of agricultural biotechnology. In fact most of them have social science backgrounds. They’re only good in making blue look white, without ever stepping into a paint shop.David is among the few scientists who have said “enough is enough” to propaganda that has come to define the debate genetically modified organisms (GMOs).David’s strategy has been to lay facts out there for all to see and decide for themselves. This is what I’ve always advocated: that the debate about genetically modified foods should be anchored in science.On Klaus’ remark that corn yields in Europe are going down, David has culled out graphs showing the continuing increase of corn yields in the U.S. The U.S. happens to be the leading grower of genetically modified corn. Connect the dots for yourself.Europe is fervently opposed to GMOs. Could this be the reason why corn yields are unimpressive there? This is the point David is trying to make. And he could be right.
Sphere: Related ContentSeptember 28th, 2008. Comment now » African scientist honored for her work in agriculturePublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
An African scientist has been honored for her work in promoting sustainable agriculture in Africa. Prof. Florence Wambugu, who heads the Africa Harvest Biotech Foundation, last week scooped the 2008 YARA prize for the African Green Revolution.Prof. Wambugu was recognized for promoting the use of tissue culture in banana farming in mainly Kenya. The technology has dramatically improved the standards of living of millions of small-scale farmers in the country and other African countries.Prof. Wambugu is an exceptional, brilliant and selfless woman. After receiving her education in the U.S. and UK, she declined lucrative jobs there to go back to Africa to help it improve its agriculture. This is uncommon to most Africans who go to Western countries to study. Most, if not all, opt to take up well-paying jobs. The fact that Prof. Wambugu decided to forego such opportunities say a lot about her character and her commitment to see Africa becomes self-sufficient in food production.Prof. Wambugu has also been at the forefront of the campaign to popularize modern agricultural biotechnology. This has not been a simple task. She has fought with anti-tech organizations, such as the Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, the two anti-biotechnology activist organizations at the forefront of the campaign against genetically modified organisms (GMOs).To reinforce here support for modern agricultural biotechnology, Prof. Wambugu, soon after receiving the YARA prize, told the SciDev.net web site that the Green Revolution currently being championed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will have to “…embrace cutting-edge biotechnology.”This call must be taken very seriously. Prof. Wambugu is not just another activist advocating for agricultural biotechnology. She understands the stuff she’s talking about. Farmers and governments in Africa better listen to her!
Sphere: Related ContentSeptember 12th, 2008. 2 Comments » Prince of Wales under fire for his anti-GMOs stancePublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
The Prince of Wales is in hot soup for claiming genetically modified crops have set the word on course for “the biggest disaster, environmentally, of all time.”In an interview with the Telegraph, last week, Prince Charles sensationally accused “gigantic corporations” of meddling with nature and urged them to spare the world the cataclysmic repercussions that might arise from genetic modification of crops.Prince Charles’ rantings against GM crops, however, have come under harsh criticism from government officials, politicians, the media and scientists for their ludicrous tinge.British Environment Minister Phil Woolas has challenged Prince Charles to provide evidence to the effect that genetically modified crops are a disaster. Woolas, in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, affirmed that the government had a “moral responsibility” to investigate whether GM crops could help alleviate hunger in the developing world.” And the minister warned the Prince of Wales not to politicize the issue of GM crops.Alison Smith, Professor of Plant Biochemistry at the John Innes Centre in Norwich, accused Prince Charles of “inflating fears instead of contributing to reasoned debate.”“He (Prince) seems to be ranting about GM crops, urbanisation, globalisation and even hybrid plants. He is inflating fears instead of contributing to reasoned debate.”The Times, in an editorial, said Prince Charles’ views on genetically modified crops were “ill-informed, alarmist and anti-science.” “…his apocalyptic predictions of the effect of genetically modified crops do not enhance public debate, but degrade it,” noted the hard-hitting editorial.British Labor MP, Des Turner, fumed that it’s “…entirely Luddite attitude to simply reject this (GM crops) out of hand.”Liberal Democratic Phil Willis, who’s also the chairman of the all-party Commons science committee, echoed the same sentiment and warned: “Prince Charles lack of scientific understanding and his willingness to condemn millions of people to starvation in areas like sub-Saharan Africa is absolutely bewildering.”Prince Charles did have supporters. Friends of the Earth and the Soil Association did issue an oblique statement supporting the Prince of Wales’ views that “GM crops would not help solve the food crisis.”This is a self-denial statement. I’ve always argued, on this blog and elsewhere, that criticism of crop genetic engineering is warranted as long it’s constructive and scientifically grounded. When somebody, for instance, claims that GM crops would not help solve the food crisis, one is left to wonder what happened to the truth. Just the same way I condemn this, I’ll also take issue with anybody who might claim that organic farming cannot help in solving the food crisis. They’ve a role to play, just like GM crops have an important contribution to make in enhancing global food security.The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) has just released a report that shows GM crops cultivation recorded a 12 per cent growth from 2006-2007. The number of countries growing GM crops also increased to 23. These are hard facts that cannot easily wished away.Realistically speaking, therefore, one can safely say that these crops are making significant contribution to global food security. This is an undeniable fact that those who support and oppose GM crops must acknowledge.For the Prince of Wales and anti-technology organizations to deny that agricultural biotechnology is making significant contribution to global food security is wrong. Acknowledging facts as they’re, perhaps, is the best way to handle the debate about cons and pros of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Sphere: Related ContentAugust 19th, 2008. 3 Comments » Extra-judicial protests on GMOs decriedPublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
An article appearing elsewhere on this blog, and which has been adapted from the Australian-based ABC News, reports that Gene Ethics, a nongovernmental organization opposed to crop genetic engineering, has mapped farmers growing genetically modified canola.The map lists their names and location of their farms. The Victorian Farmers Federation has issued a press statement condemning the tactic as amounting to bullying.“This is a disgraceful and unsubstantiated witch hunt and shows how few ethics, Gene Ethics really have,” Says VFF President, Simon Ramsay.This incident reminds me of an article I read two weeks ago featuring Howard Atkinson complaining that research institutions in Britain are spending more money guarding field trials of genetically modified crops than in research proper.Mr. Atkinson said a field trial of genetically modified potato cost Leeds University 25,000 pounds. And additional six-figure bill went to security. What a waste!The Australian and the Leeds incidents have one thing in common: anti-technology activists are fast resorting to extra-judicial measures to thwart crop genetic engineering.Rudimentary tactics being practiced by these groups are unacceptable in today’s world. People might have concerns about genetically modified organisms (GMOs), but I don’t think resorting to violence or blackmail is the most sensible thing to do. Let the world engage in a civil debate about GMOs.GMOs are products of natural science. Natural science demands that every claim be scientifically substantiated. When anti-technology activists make claims against GMOs, they should ground such in science. And they don’t have to do it themselves. Since they’re good in mobilization, they can line up scientists to do it. They can even sponsor research: They’ve huge budgets to do so. This is the most civil way of engaging in the debate about GMOs, not engaging in hooliganism, which trivializes the whole debate.Food security is an important issue that must be discussed soberly. On this blog, I’ve repeatedly stated that everything must be on the table when it comes to ensuring global food security. If organic farming can help reduce hunger and malnutrition, so be it. If GMOs can do the same, so be it. We shouldn’t have a bunch of activists dictating to farmers the kind of farming to practice.
Sphere: Related ContentAugust 12th, 2008. 1 Comment » Australian researcher wants more young people to study sciencePublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
There’s this article about Professor Wynne Jones, of Harper Adams University College in Australia, urging young people to study science. Actually, this is not the main theme of the article: It’s about the controversy surrounding genetically modified (GM) foods, and how it can be solved through public education.Jones sneaks in the idea of egging on young people to study science and technology so that that they can lead this campaign, a theory I’ve not heard since I started blogging about agricultural biotechnology. And I’ve not come across a study that shows young scientists can execute public awareness campaigns about agricultural biotechnology, or any other controversial scientific innovations, than their older counterparts.In this article, Jones rightly argues the world would be a better place if more young people study science and technology. Apart from gaining scientific knowledge for their career and professional development, Jones further argues, these young scientists - as a service to the community - would be invaluable asset in educating the public about new scientific innovation.Jones says the debate about genetically modified foods can greatly benefit from young scientists. They’ve the energy and tact to convince a wary public that modern agricultural biotechnology has great potential.“It’s up to us as educationalists and scientists to inform the public and have a debate based on fact and not heated emotions,” Says Jones referring to the confusion surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs).Jones can’t be further from right on this issue. More education and awareness about GMOs is needed. As I’ve repeatedly argued on this blog, the public has been denied education about GMOs. And to blame for this situation are scientists who always shy away from confronting those who try to distort their work. As Jones puts it, it’s high time they fill up the plate.
Sphere: Related ContentJuly 27th, 2008. 1 Comment » Transgenic tomato to treat Alzheimer’s diseasePublished by GMO Africa | Filed under GMO Africa Blog
Biotechnology Letters Journal is reporting that a group of South Korean researchers has genetically engineered a tomato to enable it treat the Alzheimer’s disease, a neurodegenerative disease, which causes dementia. Having recognized that the human Beta-amyloid is the main component of Alzheimer’s disease, the researchers sought to investigate how genetic engineering could be used to reduce it. They figured out how it could be integrated into the tomato genome. Using Agrobacterium-mediated nuclear transformation, the researchers, led by HyunSoon Kim of the Plant Genomics Research Center, based in South Korea “generated tomatoes for Beta-amyloid.”Their goal was that this tomato trait, upon consumption by Alzheimer patients, would suppress the beta-Amyloid generation and thus reduce or diminish occurrence of Alzheimer’s disease.The researchers found that mice fed on this Beta-amyloid transgenic tomato elicited an immune response, similar to the one patients of the Alzheimer disease would elicit.The Alzheimer’s disease is believed to mostly affect those aged 65 years and above. Statistics show that about 26 million people currently suffer from the disease. With the publication of this new study, it’s hoped that the transgenic tomato with Beta-amyloid will be a relief to patients of the Alzheimer’s disease.
Sphere: Related ContentJuly 16th, 2008. Comment now » Categories: Biofuels Biotech News GMO Africa Blog Guest Biotech Blogs RSS Feed Subscribe in a readerAdvertisements Archives: November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 Biotech Resources About BiotechnologyAction BioscienceActionBioscience.orgAfrica Biofortified Sorghum ProjectAfrica HarvestAfrica Science News ServiceAfricaBiotech.comAfrican Biotechnology Stakeholders Forum (ABSF)African Crops.netAg Biotech InfoNetAgBioForumagbiosAgBioWorldAgricultural Biotechnology Network in AfricaAgricultural Biotechnology Support ProjectAgriculture Network Information CenterAgriculture OnlineArgosBiotechAustralian Environment FoundationBioethics.comBiology OnlineBiopactBiotech Knowledge CenterBiotech Trust AfricaBiotechnology Trust of ZimbabweBiotechTerms.orgBlogBiotechCanadian Biotech NewsConsultative Group on International Agricultural ResearchConversations About Plant BiotechnologyCropGenCropGenEggheadEnvironment South AfricaEU Science Education and MediaEuropaBioFAO Biotechnology in Food and AgricultureForum for Agricultural Research in AfricaGenetic Engineering and Biotech NewsGenetic Engineering and Biotechnology NewsGenetically Modified FoodGenetically Modified Food WikipediaGMO SafetyHuman Genome ProjectInstitute of Food TechnologistsInternational Food Information CouncilIntuteISAAAJournal of Commercial BiotechnologyLifeeduMeridian InstituteNational Center for Biotechnology InformationNewsnabou.com GMO NewsPlant BiotechnologyScience and Development NetworkScience in AfricaScience MagazineScienceCareers.orgScitizenSlashdotSugar Industry Biotech CouncilSyngenta Foundation for Sustainable DevelopmentSystems Biology for Energy and EnvironmentThe African Agricultural Technology FoundationThe Center for the Study of Technology and Society
Copyright © GMO AFRICA | WordPress +
Greenway LCR by HSO + MM
|
|
