About site: Methods and Techniques/Scientific Method - The Scientific Method, by D. E. Simanek

About site: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scimeth.htm

Title: Methods and Techniques/Scientific Method - The Scientific Method, by D. E. Simanek A physicist's view on how science is done. While methods of science certainly exist, "The Scientific Method" does not.

The_Scientific_Method_by_Jose_Wudka Describes the process of going from observation to validated theory. Includes philosophical arguments about proofs and defining truth. Historical references to the change in past beliefs are included.

Scientific_Method_by_Michael_James Outline of history or reasoning and techniques for finding and proving theories from 20000 BC to 1630 AD.

The_Scientific_Method_for_Kids A primer on the topic. "Learning about the Scientific Method is almost like saying that you're learning how to learn. The scientific method is the way scientists learn and study the world around them.

Scientific_Method__Step_by_Step Stages of analysis, with links to discussion papers at the Department of Psychology, Henderson State University, Arkadelphia, AR.

Southeastern_Louisiana_University_-_The_Scientific_Method A step by step learning tool for understanding the scientific method.

Steps_in_the_Scientific_Method by Lambert Dolphin.

Alexa statistic for http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scimeth.htm

Please visit: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scimeth.htm

Related sites for http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scimeth.htm

Subjective_vs__Objective_Science Some scientific evidence suggests that what we call objectivity is just a generally accepted form of subjectivity. A closer look might give us a better understanding and maybe help us to narrow the gu

Ten_Myths_of_Science_Theory Article challenging current education presentations. Written by William McComas.

Test_Your_Scientific_Literacy Interactive essay outlining features of the nature of science. Attempts to dispel popular myths about the scientific methods.

Academy_of_Natural_Sciences__Joseph_Leidy Joseph Leidy is known as the Father of American Vertebrate Paleontology and the founder of American Protozoology and Parasitology. He was an expert in natural history and human anatomy during the 19th

Dinosaurs_of_the_Deep Information about Charles H. Sternberg's dinosaur collections from the Alberta badlands that sank with the Canadian Pacific Railway steamship Mount Temple when it was scuttled by a German warship. In

The_Granger_Papers_Project Independent research centering on our extensive collection of the personal expedition diaries, letters and photographs of American paleontologist Walter Granger.

A_History_of_Dinosaur_Hunting Dinosaur hunters and their discoveries, from Gideon Mantell and the changing shape of the Iguanodon to the present day

A_History_of_Evolutionary_Thought Biographies of paleontology and evolutionary thinkers from the UCMP.

Paper_Dinosaurs History of dinosaur paleontology, 1824-1969

Strange_Science__The_Rocky_Road_to_Modern_Paleontology_and_Biology A collection of misguided attempts to explain natural history, including honest and dishonest mistakes.

Chemical_Hazard_Symbols_(European/International_Standard) Symbols suitable for transport and storage of hazardous chemicals.

Chemistry_Safety_Manual Manual for the University of Bristol School of Chemistry.

Internet_MSDS_and_Hazardous_Chemical_Archives Large set of links, mainly to various university safety pages, focusing on chemical safety and awareness.

The_Lycoming_Chemistry_Safety_Page From Lycoming Chemistry department.

R-Phrases An index of the "R" Phrases. Used in European labs.

S-Phrases An index of the "S" Phrases. Used in European labs.

Access_Research_Network Focuses on putting science topics, such as genetic engineering, euthanasia, computer technology, environmental issues, creation/evolution, fetal tissue research, and AIDS, in perspective by looking at

Creation,_Creationism,_and_Empirical_Theistic_Arguments Contents for essays on scientific and philosophical objections to the theory of evolution.

Darwinism_and_Evolution Diverse articles published by the Origins website.

Frequently_Encountered_Criticisms_in_Evolution_vs__Creationism Intended to serve as an elementary introduction to the claims some creationists make against evolution. Extensive list compiled by Mark I. Vuletic, of the University of Illinois.

God_and_Evolution__A_Convergence_of_Science_and_Religion Built on the thesis that the purpose of evolution is the development of human beings and for this to occur a God is necessary.

Intelligent_Design_Theory__Why_it_Matters Jay Richards examines a new scientific orthodoxy that challenges Darwin's materialistic views. From Intelligent Design, February 25, 1999.

ACFnewsource_org\'s_Environment_Coverage Feature stories from U.S. nonprofit organization specializing in research, development and production of news stories on substantive issues, including the environment, for commercial radio and televis

Africa2020_-_Environment_and_Sustainable_Development Provides daily environmental stories and information from around the African Union. Also features links to radio broadcasts.

Afrol_News_-_Environment News and analysis focused on Africa. In English and Spanish.

allAfrica_com__Environment_and_Sustainable_Development Articles, news and reports on issues in Africa. Bilingual English and French.

Animal_News_-_theBigZoo_com A variety of animal-related articles from around the web. Includes zoo births & deaths, endangered species updates and scientific discoveries.

BNA\'s_EHS_Professional_Information_Center Provides news, analysis, and source materials prepared by the Environment, Health & Safety Division at BNA, Inc.

The_Cartoonist_Group Recent cartoons on environmental issues and related topics.

E_The_Environmental_Magazine Independent, non-partisian reporting covering personal, community and global isses. Published by Earth Action Network.

Earth_Vision Electronic news source covering environmental resources, information, and organizations.

EarthWire Daily service managed by UNEP/GRID-Arendal, with headlines compiled from local news sources around the world.

Eco_Connections Online magazine features current articles of news and events on the environment and conservation efforts with an emphasis on the Carolinas. Produced by Catawba College.

Eco_Media Australian service compiling online news and media releases on environment and conservation. Sources include mainstream news services, environmental organizations, government bodies and political part

EDIE_-_Environmental_Data_Interactive_Exchange News on environmental science and issues, with global scope and UK focus. Also includes product announcements, job listings, events announcements, and registered-user access to tenders and RFPs.

ENDS_Environment_Daily Fee-based news service covering European environmental policy, regulation and other topics for professionals.

The_ENDS_Report UK publication on environmental policy and business for professionals, including environmental analysis, legislation, regulations, and jobs. Requires subscription to view articles.

Environment_News_Service News on issues affecting the earth.

Environmental_Protection_Magazine On-line publication for environmental professionals. Focus is on environmental compliance.

Florida_Environment_Radio Daily feature on issues in and news about Florida's environment. Produced for Florida's public radio stations and The Southwest Florida Council for Environment Education (SWFCEE).

This is now2007.com cache of m/ as retrieved on 2008.11.19 now2007.com's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web. The page may have changed since that time.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

by Donald E. Simanek Too often the "scientific method" is presented in schools and textbooks as a "recipe" for doing science, with numbered steps even! That's misleading. At the other extreme, someone said that scientific method is "Doing one's damndest with one's mind." I know many have said more profound things about this subject than I will offer, but here's some informal comments about scientific method presented as a set of practical and general guidlines for doing science. Scientists have learned these through trial and error during the entire history of science. The Methods of Science Even casual observation shows us that nature, as perceived by our senses, has reliable regularities and patterns of behavior. The use of measuring instruments and scientific apparatus confirms this and reveals even more, and even more detailed, patterns in nature. Through systematic and careful study scientists found that these regularities can be modeled, often as mathematical models of great precision. Sometimes these models break down when extended (extrapolated). Extrapolation is the process of extending a model or law beyond its known range of applicability. Sometimes extrapolation of a law or model to new situations actually works, but sometimes it fails miserably. This tells us that we had better rigorously test each model for validity, in a wide range of situations, and these tests should be capable of exposing any flaws in the model. That is, they should be capable of demonstrating that the model isn't completely true. Even when a model survives such testing we should only grant it "provisional" acceptance. In the future, cleverer people with more sophisticated measuring techniques and a more advanced scientific conceptual framework may expose deficiencies of the model that we didn't notice. When models are discovered to be incomplete or deficient, we often fix them by tweaking the model's details till it works. But when rapid advances in experimental observations occur, a model may be found so seriously inadequate to accommodate the new data that we may scrap a large part of it and start over with a new model. Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are examples. These situations are often called "scientific revolutions." When such upheavals occur, and old models are replaced with new ones, that doesn't mean the old ones were "wrong". They still work within their original scope of applicability. Newton's physics wasn't suddenly wrong, nor were its predictions found unreliable or incorrect, when we adopted Einstein's relativity. Relativity had greater scope of applicability than Newtonian physics. But it also rested on a different conceptual basis. When a new model does include significantly new concepts this can provide a tremendous stimulus for further advances. It shakes up our comfortable habits of thought, forcing us to think about nature in new ways. Again, this does not mean the concepts of the old model were wrong, or worse than those of the new one. It just means that the new model's concepts may be more productive and adaptable for further development. But there's always another side to every coin. The new concepts, seemingly "better" may in fact seductively lure us down a dead-end path. Such was the case with the concept of the luminiferous ether. These mistakes are swept under the rug of history when they are replaced. Past experience has shown that mathematical models of nature have tremendous advantages over the earlier, more appealing, models that used analogies with familiar everyday phenomena of our direct sensory experience. Mathematical models are less burdened with emotional baggage, being more abstract. Also, mathematics is apparently infinitely adaptable and flexible. If a some natural phenomena doesn't yield to known mathematics, we can invent new forms of mathematics to deal with it. The history of science has been a process of finding successful descriptive models of nature. First we found the easy ones. As science progressed, scientists were forced to tackle the more subtle and difficult problems. So powerful are our models by now that we often delude ourselves into thinking that we are very clever to have been able to figure out how nature "really" works. We may even imagine that we have achieved "understanding". But on sober reflection we realize that we have simply devised a more sophisticated and detailed description. Whatever models or theories we use, they usually include some details or concepts that do not relate directly to observed or measurable aspects of nature. If a theory is successful we may suppose that its details are matched in nature, and are "real", even when they are not directly verifiable experimentally. Their "reality" is assumed by some people (and most students) to be demonstrated by the fact that the theory "works" to predict things that we can verify and continue to verify in the future. This is not necessarily so. So scientists often speak of energy, momentum, wave functions and force fields as if they had the same status as objects of everyday experience such as rocks, trees and water. In a practical sense (for getting answers) this conflation of concepts from direct sensory experience and invented concepts may not matter. But on another level, a change of scientific model may do away with a force field as an conceptual entity, but it wouldn't do away with a forest, mountain or lake. The notion that we can find absolute and final truths is naive. If there are any underlying "truths" of nature, our models are just close approximations to them—useful descriptions which "work" by correctly predicting nature's behavior. We are not in a position to answer the philosophical question "Are there any absolute truths?". We can't even determine whether there is an underlying "reality" to be discovered. And, though our laws and models (theories) become better and better, we have no reason to expect they will ever be perfected. So we have no justification for absolute faith or belief in any of them. They may be replaced someday by something quite different in appearance and with different underlying concepts. At least they will be modified. But that won't make the old models "untrue", for the old models will work as well as they always did. All of these reservations and qualifications about truth, reality, and belief, don't matter in a practical sense—such philosophical quibbles aren't relevant to doing science. We can do science quite well without 'answering' these questions—questions that may not even have answers. Science limits itself to more finite questions for which we can arrive at practical answers. We've learned that not all questions we can ask have answers we can find. Any question that is in principle or in practice untestable is not considered a valid scientific question. We like to think we don't waste time on those, but they seem to pop up in internet and classroom discussions quite often. Many people think unanswerable questions are the most profound and important ones. Questions such as "What is the meaning of it all," "What lies outside the universe," or "What jump-started the universe?" Scientists should set these aside for the philosophers to chew on, and get on with the business of answering more accessible questions. Science progresses through trial and error, mostly error. Every new theory or law must be skeptically and rigorously tested before acceptance. Most fail, and are swept under the rug, even before publication. Others, like the luminiferous ether, flourish for a while, then their inadequacies accumulate till they are intolerable, and they are quietly abandoned when something better comes along. Such mistakes will be found out. There's always someone who will delight in exposing them. Science progresses by making mistakes, correcting the mistakes, then moving on to other matters. If we stopped making mistakes, scientific progress would stop. This document, written January 2000 and edited April 26, 2000, is © 2000 by Dr. Donald E. Simanek. It may be reproduced for non-profit educational purposes, provided it is not altered, and its copyright notice is clearly indicated. The author would appreciate notice of any published or internet uses of this essay, and a copy of the publication in which it is used.

Input and suggestions are welcome at this address. When commenting on a specific document, please reference it by name or content. Return to Donald Simanek's page.

A	physicist's	view	on
how	science	is	done.
While	methods	of	science	certainly
exist,	"The	Scientific	Method"	does
not.

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/scimeth.htm

The Scientific Method, by D. E. Simanek 2008 November

dvd rental

dvd

A physicist's view on how science is done. While methods of science certainly exist, "The Scientific Method" does not.

Rules

Recommended Sites: 1. Arts - Business - Computers - Games - Health - Home - Kids and Teens - News - Recreation - Reference - Regional - Science - Shopping - Society - Sports - World Miss Gallery - Top Anime Hentai - DVD rental by mail - Property Search - Personal Injury Attorney Los Angeles - PrePaid Credit Cards - Mobile Phones - Online Advertising

2008-11-19 03:42:31

Copyright 2005, 2006 by Webmaster
Websites is cool :)